List of Abbreviations |
|
xiii | |
Table of Cases |
|
xv | |
Table of Legislation |
|
xxxiii | |
1 JUDICIAL REVIEW: AN INTRODUCTION |
|
1 | |
|
1.1 WHAT IS JUDICIAL REVIEW? |
|
|
1 | |
|
|
4 | |
|
1.3 COUNTRY PERSPECTIVES ON JUDICIAL REVIEW |
|
|
7 | |
|
1.3.1 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO |
|
|
7 | |
|
|
9 | |
|
|
11 | |
|
|
16 | |
2 GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW |
|
19 | |
|
2.1 UNREASONABLENESS OF THE DECISION |
|
|
22 | |
|
|
25 | |
|
2.3 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANDATORY DIRECTIONS |
|
|
31 | |
|
|
37 | |
|
2.5 THE DECISION-MAKER MUST MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DECISION |
|
|
40 | |
|
2.6 IMPROPER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY |
|
|
40 | |
|
2.7 ABDICATION OF FUNCTIONS |
|
|
41 | |
|
|
43 | |
|
|
46 | |
|
2.10 FAILURE TO OBSERVE THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY |
|
|
47 | |
|
2.11 BREACH OF A LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION |
|
|
48 | |
|
2.12 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SETTLED PRACTICE |
|
|
67 | |
|
2.13 ACTING OUTSIDE OR IN EXCESS OF JURISDICTION |
|
|
68 | |
|
|
75 | |
|
2.15 TAKING INTO ACCOUNT IRRELEVANT CONSIDERATIONS |
|
|
75 | |
|
2.16 FAILURE TO CONSIDER RELEVANT MATTERS |
|
|
79 | |
|
2.17 DECISIONS MUST NOT BE TAINTED BY BIAS |
|
|
82 | |
|
2.18 ERRORS IN FORM OR PROCEDURE LACKING IN SUBSTANCE |
|
|
98 | |
|
2.19 FAILURE TO ASCERTAIN RELEVANT INFORMATION |
|
|
104 | |
|
2.20 PURSUING IMPROPER OBJECTIVES |
|
|
105 | |
|
|
105 | |
|
2.22 IMPROPER FINDING OF FACTS |
|
|
110 | |
|
2.23 WRONG ADHERENCE TO POLICY |
|
|
112 | |
|
2.24 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ADOPTED OR PUBLISHED PROCEDURES |
|
|
113 | |
|
|
113 | |
|
2.26 RIGHTS MUST BE CONSTRUED AS MEANINGFUL |
|
|
114 | |
3 NATURAL JUSTICE |
|
115 | |
|
3.1 OBSERVANCE OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE |
|
|
115 | |
|
3.1.1 RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING |
|
|
126 | |
|
3.1.2 RIGHT TO FULL PARTICULARS |
|
|
134 | |
|
3.1.3 RIGHT TO CONSULTATION |
|
|
136 | |
|
3.1.4 RIGHT TO RESPOND/MAKE REPRESENTATIONS |
|
|
139 | |
|
3.1.5 DUTY NOT TO MAKE DECISION BEFORE HEARING |
|
|
141 | |
|
|
143 | |
|
3.1.7 RIGHT TO KNOW OF INVESTIGATION |
|
|
149 | |
|
3.1.8 RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE FULLY IN HEARING |
|
|
149 | |
|
3.1.9 RIGHT TO KNOW OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE FINDINGS |
|
|
149 | |
|
3.1.10 RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION |
|
|
150 | |
4 OBSTACLES TO A JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THE MERITS OF A JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION |
|
151 | |
|
|
152 | |
|
4.2 LEAVE GRANTED WHERE THERE IS AN ARGUABLE CASE |
|
|
155 | |
|
|
158 | |
|
|
175 | |
|
4.5 PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC FUNCTION |
|
|
180 | |
|
4.6 OUSTER OF JURISDICTION |
|
|
195 | |
|
4.7 MIXING OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL REVIEW MATTERS |
|
|
200 | |
|
4.8 ALTERNATIVE PROCEEDINGS |
|
|
201 | |
|
4.9 REMEDY SOUGHT MUST BE MEANINGFUL |
|
|
206 | |
|
4.10 PREJUDICE TO THIRD PARTIES |
|
|
210 | |
|
|
210 | |
|
4.12 GRANTING REVIEW OR SUBSTITUTING DECISION |
|
|
211 | |
|
|
214 | |
|
|
215 | |
|
|
216 | |
|
4.16 REVIEWING EXECUTIVE ACTIONS |
|
|
218 | |
|
4.17 REVIEWING JUDICIAL ACTIONS |
|
|
221 | |
|
4.18 REVIEWING PROSECUTORIAL AUTHORITY |
|
|
223 | |
|
|
223 | |
|
4.20 PRESUMPTION OF REGULARITY |
|
|
224 | |
|
4.21 PREMATURE PROCEEDINGS |
|
|
225 | |
|
|
226 | |
|
|
226 | |
|
4.24 JUDICIAL REVIEW AS FINAL PROCEEDINGS |
|
|
227 | |
5 CONDUCT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS |
|
231 | |
|
5.1 NEWSPAPER ARTICLES AS EVIDENCE |
|
|
232 | |
|
5.2 WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY |
|
|
234 | |
|
5.3 FRESH EVIDENCE AND EX POST FACTO REASONS |
|
|
234 | |
|
|
236 | |
|
|
237 | |
|
|
237 | |
|
|
240 | |
|
|
240 | |
|
|
242 | |
|
|
243 | |
|
|
243 | |
6 REMEDIES |
|
245 | |
|
|
248 | |
|
|
249 | |
|
|
251 | |
|
|
255 | |
|
|
259 | |
7 BREAKING NEW GROUNDS |
|
261 | |
|
7.1 EQUALITY OF TREATMENT |
|
|
261 | |
|
|
266 | |
|
|
267 | |
|
|
274 | |
|
7.5 CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE |
|
|
278 | |
|
|
279 | |
8 CONCLUSION: JUSTICE IN THE FUTURE |
|
281 | |
APPENDIX A TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO |
|
283 | |
|
THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT, NO. 60 OF 2000 |
|
|
283 | |
|
LEGAL NOTICE NO. 184: THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE (JUDICIAL REVIEW) |
|
|
288 | |
|
|
288 | |
|
THE JUDICIAL REVIEW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2005 |
|
|
291 | |
APPENDIX B JAMAICA |
|
293 | |
|
SUPREME COURT OF JAMAICA CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES 2002 |
|
|
293 | |
APPENDIX C BARBADOS |
|
300 | |
|
ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACT, NO. 63 OF 1980 |
|
|
300 | |
|
THE JUDICIAL REVIEW (APPLICATION) RULES, 1983 |
|
|
303 | |
Index |
|
305 | |