|
|
|
xi | |
| Preface |
|
xii | |
| Acknowledgements |
|
xvi | |
|
Laws in science and philosophy |
|
|
1 | (18) |
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
|
|
4 | (4) |
|
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
PART I Humean lawlessness |
|
|
19 | (46) |
|
|
|
21 | (10) |
|
Just one little thing and then another |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Conjunctions, connections and laws |
|
|
27 | (3) |
|
Humean `theories of laws' |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Regularities and best systems |
|
|
31 | (19) |
|
Regularity and less-than-universal regularity |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Irrefutable but unappealing |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
The critique of the regularity theory |
|
|
35 | (5) |
|
|
|
40 | (5) |
|
Problems for best systems |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
|
50 | (15) |
|
The Humean view of necessity and laws |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
The arguments of the Treatisc and Enquiry |
|
|
51 | (6) |
|
Was Hume a sceptical realist? |
|
|
57 | (4) |
|
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
Conjunction as evidence of necessity |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
PART II Nomological realism |
|
|
65 | (60) |
|
|
|
67 | (16) |
|
What is nomological realism? |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Do we need a nomological argument? |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
Without laws, there would be no order |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
Without laws, there would be nothing |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
Without laws, there would be no science |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
How compelling is the nomological argument? |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
A less direct argument for laws? |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Natural necessitation relations |
|
|
83 | (22) |
|
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Key virtues over the regularity theory |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
Variants on the DTA theory |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
Some perceived weaknesses of DTA |
|
|
92 | (4) |
|
Armstrong's nomological argument |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
Instantiation and supervenience |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
How can Armstrong's laws govern? |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Necessitarian essentialism |
|
|
105 | (20) |
|
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
The essentialist theory of laws |
|
|
106 | (4) |
|
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
|
|
113 | (3) |
|
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
From reference to essence? |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Essentialist laws not proved |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
PART III Realist lawlessness |
|
|
125 | (81) |
|
Are natural laws a natural kind? |
|
|
127 | (16) |
|
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
The elusive and ineffable nature of laws |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
|
|
134 | (5) |
|
A family resemblance between laws? |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
|
|
143 | (17) |
|
The Central Dilemma: introduction |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
The argument: summary formulation |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
The governing role of laws |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
The Central Dilemma, first horn: externalized laws |
|
|
146 | (3) |
|
External laws and quidditism |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
The Central Dilemma, second horn: internalized laws |
|
|
153 | (3) |
|
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Full statement and conclusion |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
|
|
160 | (22) |
|
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Full strength necessity in laws |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Contingent natural necessity |
|
|
163 | (3) |
|
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
Is a power's necessity merely analytic? |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
|
|
170 | (4) |
|
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Restricted combinatorialsim |
|
|
175 | (5) |
|
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
|
182 | (19) |
|
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
Do all properties have a causal essence? |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
How might the account be extended to relations? |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
Why is this not a theory of laws? |
|
|
195 | (2) |
|
Why is this theory not subject to the Central Dilemma? |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Am I looking for the wrong kind of law? |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Can all laws be replaced by powers? |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Powers are no better understood than laws |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
Conclusion: law and metaphor |
|
|
201 | (5) |
|
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Law as the wrong metaphor |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Law as a harmful metaphor |
|
|
203 | (3) |
| Notes |
|
206 | (12) |
| Bibliography |
|
218 | (7) |
| Index |
|
225 | |